-: Good evening.
Good evening, my name is John Ritchie
and I'm a junior biology major from Westfield, Indiana.
And it is my pleasure to introduce our next speaker.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is the founder, chairman,
and chief legal counsel of Children's Health Defense,
founder of Waterkeeper Alliance,
and of counsel at Morgan and Morgan,
a nationwide personal injury practice.
He earned a BA from Harvard University,
a JD from the University of Virginia School of Law,
and an LLM from the Pace University School of Law.
He also studied at the London School of Economics.
A recipient of numerous awards,
including the Stroud Award for Freshwater Excellence
and the Theodore Gordon Flyfishers Conservation Award,
Mr. Kennedy has practiced law
for nearly four decades working on environmental initiatives
and defending victims of government
and corporate corruption and abuse.
He is the author of numerous books including,
"American Values: Lessons that I Learned from my Family,"
"The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma,
"and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,"
and forthcoming "The Wuhan Coverup:
"How U.S. Health Officials Conspired
"with the Chinese Military to Hide the Origins of COVID-19."
Please join me in welcoming Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
(audience applauding)
-: Thank you all very much.
Thank you, I'm very, very happy to be here.
Can you hear me?
(audience laughing)
If you can't hear me, raise your hand.
(audience laughing)
I'm really happy to be here.
It's, although I've never been here before,
it feels like a, almost like a homecoming because
of the incredible role that this institution played
during COVID 19, where it was the only college left
in the country that really stood up for freedom.
(audience applauding)
And you know what?
This college was established in 1844.
Abolitionists were despised by the vast majority,
90% of the people in our country hated them
and thought they were crazy,
and that they were unrealistic.
And it wasn't really until three years into the Civil War
that it flipped and that the president came out
and freed the slaves and he couldn't do it
because just the public antipathy for abolitionism.
So it's really,
this institution has an extraordinary history
and it's been very, very faithful to the values
upon which it was established,
which is this love of freedom,
no matter what public opinion,
no matter what the public cost,
no matter who pressures you to stop,
let's us stand up for it.
And it's really a testimony to something special
and the investment that has been made here,
not in building a pile, teaching students
to build a pile for themselves,
like most colleges, and whoever dies with the most of wins.
But instead, building character and demonstrating character.
(audience applauding)
And, oh, thank you.
I'm going to, somebody last night asked me
about how I got into the anti-vax racket
and which I'm not anti-vaccine,
although I'm kind of the poster child
for the anti-vax movement.
But I've been an environmental attorney for now 40 years.
Up until 2005, that's all I did.
And then that year,
I ran into a a group called Hudson Riverkeeper,
which I represented for 40 years, commercial fishermen
on the Hudson and recreational fishermen suing polluters
who were destroying their livelihoods,
their property values, their communities.
And they had a business model,
we have the oldest commercial fishery
in the country on the Hudson.
The people I represented for 40 years,
many of them came from families
that have been fishing the river continuously
since Dutch Colonial times,
since the traditional gear fishery.
They used the same fishing methods
that were taught by the Algonquin Indians,
to the original Dutch settlers of New Amsterdam,
and then passed down through the generations.
And they had a business model
that worked for three centuries.
And then they were put out of business
by polluters who had political clout
and who were able to manipulate government agencies,
capture and manipulate government agencies,
in order to escape the discipline
of the free market and force the public
to pay their production costs.
And they had turned the Hudson Valley
into kind of a, not free market capitalism,
but corporate crony capitalism
and this corporate kleptocracy,
which really is about socialism for the rich
and a very savage and brutal and merciless brand
of capitalism for the poor.
And they saw this happening.
And I fought for them for 40 years,
but we were successful, I brought
over 300 successful lawsuits on the Hudson
by the year 2000.
We had forced polluters
to spend $3.5 billion remediating the river.
The river, when I started working there, caught fire.
It turned colors, depending
on what color they were painting the trucks
at the GM plant in Tarrytown.
It was dead water, zero dissolved oxygen,
for 20 miles north of the city, 20 miles south.
Today, it is an international model
for ecosystem protection.
It's the richest waterway in the North Atlantic.
It produces more pounds of fish per acre,
more biomass per gallon,
than any other waterway in the Atlantic Ocean,
north of the equator.
It's the last major river system left
in the Atlantic that still has strong spawning stocks
of all of its historical species of migratory fish,
And the miraculous resurrection
of the Hudson inspired river keepers on waterways
all over the world.
We became the biggest water protection group in the world.
We have 350 waterkeepers, each one has a patrol boat.
They each patrol a local waterway,
and they litigate against polluters.
And we're a law enforcement organization.
We have great environmental laws,
but because of agency capture,
they're almost never enforced.
And so, but we're allowed to enforce them
under a provision called the Citizen Supervision.
In 2003, the National Academy of Sciences published a report
that showed that every freshwater fish in North America,
a 10-year study, was contaminated
with dangerous levels of mercury.
And so the waterkeepers, who represent fishermen,
were particularly, this seemed to us like
we were living in a science fiction nightmare,
where my children, the children of every
other American could now no longer engage
in the seminal primal activity of American youth,
which is to go fishing in the local waterway
and then come home and safely eat the fish.
And those companies had privatized the public comments,
a resource that is owned by the public.
To make profits for themselves, they had privatized,
we no longer own the fish.
The companies who are doing that polluter,
which is coal-burning power plants
and cement kilns, primarily.
So in 2005, we started suing them.
A lot of people were suing coal plants,
but we were suing them, the waterkeepers were suing
them on mercury.
And I had 40 suits going by 2005.
And I was traveling all around the country talking
to crowds like this about mercury.
And at almost every speech I gave,
this group, these groups of women,
and they were different at every place,
would come and sit in the front row.
Before long they'd show up early,
and then when I was getting, when I finished,
they'd wait and they'd ask to talk to me.
And as it turns out, they were,
all of them, were the mothers
of intellectually disabled children.
And they all believed that the vaccines
had caused their child's injury,
particularly mercury vaccines.
And they would say to me, in a very respectful,
but oh so, kind of vaguely, scolding way,
if you're really interested in mercury exposures
to children, you need to look at vaccines.
I didn't wanna do it.
I had spent a lot of my life working on the issues
of intellectual disabilities.
I was, it was part of the DNA of my family.
My Aunt Eunice who was also my Godmother,
started Special Olympics.
I had been working at, well in Special Olympics,
was then called Camp Shriver, since I was eight years old,
every weekend as a hugger, as a coach.
I spent 200 hours as a teenager in high school working
in Wassaic Home for the Retarded.
My family, my uncle was chair of the health committee
for 50 years.
My family wrote a lot of the legislation
that gave rights and changed the entire relationship
with individuals with intellectual disabilities,
the most vulnerable population in the country.
But I didn't wanna do that for my life.
I wanted to work on fisheries,
on water pollution, on energy.
And so I was dodging these ladies.
(audience laughing)
And then one of 'em, one of them came to my house,
found my house on Cape Cod, in the summer of 2005.
She was a psychologist from Minnesota named Sarah Bridges.
She had a son who got severe autism from a mercury vaccine.
He had gotten a $20 million award from the vaccine court,
which recognized his autism came from the vaccine,
which was no controversy.
And she didn't want it to happen to other children.
And she showed up at my house
and she took out of the trunk of her car a stack
of studies, about 18 inches deep.
She put it on my front stoop,
then she knocked on the door.
And when I came to the door,
she pointed to the pile and she said,
"I'm not leaving here till you read those."
(audience laughing)
And I'm accustomed to reading science.
I wanted to be a scientist when I was a kid.
And my, the kind of law
that I practice involves a lot of science.
So almost every suit that I brought has involved
some kind of scientific controversy.
And I would not be very good at my job
if I didn't enjoy reading science
and if I could not read it critically.
And so I sat down and I didn't read the studies,
but I read the abstracts.
And I got about six inches down on that pile.
And I was just dumbstruck by this huge delta between
what the public health agencies
were saying the science said,
and what the actual peer-reviewed,
published science was saying.
And I started after that, doing what I always did
when I didn't understand something.
I had, because of my name and my family's relationships
with these agencies, I could always get the head
of an agency on a phone very quickly.
And I started calling them and asking questions.
I got Francis Collins from NIH, and Kathleen Stratton,
and Marie McCormick from Institute of Medicine.
And they told me something weird.
I asked them about science,
and I realized they were completely not conversant with it.
They were just parroting this phrase, "safe and effective".
They hadn't read any of the actual science.
And when I asked them about details, they said,
"You have to talk to Paul Offit."
Well, Paul Offit is a vaccine developer
who's a partner of Merck's.
And I had been working with,
with EPA for many years, suing, probably 20%
of my losses were against EPA, which is a captive agency.
But captive by the oil and chemical
and pesticide industries.
And, EPA, if I call a science guy or a regulator there,
they're gonna have some self-respect
and they're gonna try to answer my question.
They're not gonna direct me to a coal industry lobbyist.
So this was bizarre.
And when I talked to Paul Offit, I caught him in a lie,
which I'm not gonna go into, I'd love to go into,
but I'm gonna, I need to conserve my time here,
so take my word for it.
(audience laughing)
But he knew I caught him in a lie, I knew,
and there was that moment where we're like,
you are just a liar.
(audience laughing)
And so then, I realize, okay,
these guys you don't know what they're doing
or they're lying about it deliberately.
And then I realized these agencies were completely captured,
but agency captured on steroids.
FDA gets more than 50% of its budget
from the pharmaceutical companies.
CDC has a $12 billion budget and 5 billion of that,
so almost half, goes to buying vaccines from these companies
and then distribute 'em.
So if you work at CDC, you do not get promotions
by finding probable problems with vaccines.
You get promoted by increasing uptake.
And then NIH is just an incubator
for pharmaceutical products.
So it develops the vaccines,
hands them over to the industry,
hands 'em over to the universities,
which then get NIH money, 200, $300 million
to do phase two and phase three,
phase one and phase two trials.
Then if those are successful,
which they always are, 'cause they make 'em successful,
they then call in the pharmaceutical company
to do a phase three.
And then they all divide up the royalty,
the patent march-in rights, and then they all go,
then Tony Fauci, who is the head of NIH,
walks it through the regulatory process at FDA,
and CDC, where he's picked the members
of the panels who are all taking money from him.
And they know their product is next in line
and their job is to rubber stamp
this product and recommend it to children.
So I saw this process and how it worked,
and it was regulatory capture on steroids.
It was like, and then NIH gets the money.
I got deplatformed for saying, NIH owns half
this Moderna vaccine.
He said, that's vaccine misinformation.
Well, guess what?
On Thursday this week, Moderna made a $400 million payment
to NIH for its share the royalties to date.
So, all of my conspiracy theories have
about a three-month shelf life before they become reality.
(audience applauding)
Then what I realized, I do this very quickly,
I saw what had happened in the vaccine program.
And when I was a kid I got three vaccines
and I was compliant.
And, but my kids, I have seven kids,
they got the 72 vaccines and they're all mandated.
In California, you can't get out of it.
And so how did that happen?
It happened because Ronald Reagan signed the Vaccine Act.
What happened is they, in 1979,
they started using a DTP vaccine, diptheria, tetanus,
and pertussis, which is now illegal in Europe
and the United States.
Bill Gates gives it to 161 million African kids a year
but it was killing or doing permanent brain damage
to one in every 300 kids, according to an NIH study,
commissioned study, at UCLA.
Oh, this was devastating.
So we got rid of it and we switched it
with another attenuated version of the vaccine
that is less dangerous and less effective.
But Wyeth, which made it, which is now called Pfizer,
went to Reagan and said, "We're paying $20
"in downstream liability for every dollar
"that we make in profits
"and we're gonna get outta the vaccine business altogether
"unless you give us full immunity from liability."
And Reagan said, "Why don't you make the vaccine safe?"
And they said, "Because vaccines are unavoidably unsafe."
And that phrase is in the preamble of the statute.
So when people tell you it's safe and effective,
the statute that they're relying on says
they're unavoidably unsafe.
And the Bruesewitz versus Wyeth case,
which is the Supreme Court case that upheld that statute,
has the same phrase in it.
So as soon as he did that,
now they have this liability shield,
so no matter how negligent they are,
no matter how reckless they are,
no matter how grievous your injury,
no matter how toxic and unnecessary the product,
no matter how unnecessary and ineffective the vaccine,
you cannot sue them.
And of course these are the companies
that are not good companies.
These are the same companies
that gave us the opioid epidemic,
that now kills more, 68,000 kids
in this country every year.
More than the Vietnam War did in 20 years.
And they knew it.
And if you look at that Netflix documentary "Dopesick,"
it shows exactly how they did it
because the FDA was totally corrupted
by this industry and did whatever they said.
And so this is the industry,
what happens when you go to that industry
and you say, now no matter what you do,
by the way, four companies that make all
of our vaccines have paid $35 billion
in criminal penalties in the last 10 years.
These are criminal enterprises.
Criminality, there are serial felons, every one of them.
(audience applauding)
So why do you think if you remove any chance
they'll ever get caught,
that they're suddenly gonna find Jesus and say yeah,
because in my political party,
everybody knows the Democrats,
everybody knows the pharmaceutical companies are
just the worst, most corrupt company that there are.
But when it comes to vaccines, they're not corrupt.
(audience laughing)
And it's a this weird cognitive dissonance.
So then what happened is that you had these companies
that now are absolved from the biggest cost
of every medicine, which is downstream liability.
Then they're absolved from something else.
Vaccines are the only medical product
that never has to do pre-licensing safety studies.
So not one, and this is an artifact of CDC's legacy
as the public health service,
which is part the uniformed military services,
and the public health service launched the vaccine program
as a national security defense
against biological attacks in our country.
So they wanted to make sure that if the Russians attacked
us with anthrax or some other biologic agent,
we could quickly formulate a vaccine and then deploy it
to 200 million Americans with no regulatory impediments.
'Cause they said if we call it a medicine,
we're gonna have to test it for safety.
That takes five years.
'Cause a lot of the injuries
from medical products have long diagnostic horizons
or long incubation periods.
You don't see 'em for five years.
And you could be saving 10,000 lives
from diptheria and killing a hundred thousand people
from cancer five years later.
You wanna find out if that's true.
But they said we don't have time to do that.
So we're gonna call them biologics
and we will exempt biologics from any safety testing.
So for many years, I was saying not one
of the 72 vaccines mandated
for children has ever been safety tested
in pre-licensing placebo-controlled trials.
Not one.
Tony Fauci was saying, "He's lying."
In 2016, president Trump appointed me
to run a vaccine safety commission.
And he ordered Fauci and Collins to meet
with me with White House counsel present.
And I said to Fauci at that meeting,
"You say I'm lying, for eight years
"you've been saying I'm lying about this.
"Show me the study."
And at that point he made this show of going through,
a lawyer's red-well like he was looking for a study.
And he said, "I don't have it here,
"it's back in Bethesda and I'll send it to you."
I never got it.
So I sued him.
Me and Erin Seery, and after stonewalling us for a year,
their lawyers met us on the courthouse steps and said,
"Yep, you're right, we never had any study."
And they gave it to us in writing.
You can go to the CHD website, my website,
and you can see that letter from HHS.
So, they don't have to do,
there's no downstream liability,
there's no front-end safety testing.
That saves 'em a quarter billion dollars.
And there's no marketing and advertising costs,
'cause the federal government is ordering them,
ordering 78 million school kids to take
that vaccine every year.
What better product could you have?
And so there was a gold rush
to add all these new vaccines to the schedule
that we don't need.
Why would you give a hepatitis B vaccine
to a child, a baby?
The only way you get hepatitis B,
(audience applauding)
you can get it from the mother,
but every mother's tested in the hospital.
Every mother who goes in the hospital is tested,
so, you know, you give it to those kids, okay.
The only way that you get it is
from sleeping with a prostitute, unprotected sex,
or male promiscuity,
or from sharing needles
with somebody who's got it.
Well the little baby gets it on the first day of life.
He's not gonna do any of that stuff.
(audience laughing)
So why they do it?
I'll tell you why, because Merck,
because Fauci told Merck to make the vaccine.
Fauci helped make it, develop it, Merck made it,
and they said we're gonna sell it to prostitutes
and to male homosexuals.
Merck came back a year later and says,
"None of these guys want it.
(audience laughing)
"They got other things they wanted to spend their money on."
And they're not, they're not people who are
really concerned with health, by the way.
Oh, so the CDC and FDA said, "Don't worry."
They said we put all this money,
Merck said, "We put all the money
"into infrastructure and now nobody's buying it."
And so they said, "Okay, we'll mandate it for children."
That's why these kids have to get hepatitis B vaccines.
The entire safety testing
for Merck's hepatitis B vaccine, four days.
Oh, it's criminal.
And most of these vaccines are unnecessary.
Many of them are for diseases
that are not even casually contagious.
It was a gold rush.
'Cause if you get onto that schedule,
the recommended schedule, it's a billion dollars a year
for your company.
And in many cases NIH is sharing the royalties.
So we got all of these new vaccines, 72 shots, 16 vaccines,
and now even more 'cause we're doing the HPV vaccine.
And that year, 1989, we saw an explosion
in chronic disease in American children.
Any of you who are my age,
I'm gonna name some of the diseases that are most common.
You think about it, whether, if you're my age, I'm 69.
I had 11 brothers and sisters, 70 cousins,
and I never saw any of these diseases.
I never knew a kid with a peanut allergy.
And why do five of my kids have food allergies?
Well, asthma was around, but it was rare.
My brother's doctor, my brother has asthma.
His doctor said there'll never be a cure for this disease
'cause it's too rare, nobody ever studies it.
Now one out of every four Black children has asthma.
The neurological diseases suddenly exploded in 1989.
ADHD, sleep disorders, language delays,
ASD, autism, Tourette's syndrome, ticks, narcolepsy.
These are all things that I never heard of.
Autism went from one in 10,000 in my generation,
according to the CDC data, to one in every 34 kids today,
one in every 22 boys.
And some of these kids, in severe,
I've never seen anybody my age with severe autism,
severe real, full-blown autism.
That means stimming, headbanging, toe walking,
non-verbal, non toilet trained.
Where do you, where are these people?
Why don't you see them in the malls?
'Cause they didn't exist then.
And there's no, they're not locked up anywhere,
'cause there's no place to put 'em.
But one in 34 kids has it.
About half of them look like that.
These are kids that'll never hit a baseball,
they'll never pay taxes, they'll never vote,
they'll never write a poem.
These are kids who, many of them,
will never sit on a toilet unassisted.
They'll never go out on a date.
We did this to a generation of kids.
Those in the neurological disorders, autoimmune diseases.
I never knew anybody with juvenile diabetes,
rheumatoid arthritis, lupus.
170 autoimmune diseases that have now exploded.
Congress said to the EPA,
tell us what year the autism epidemic began.
And the EPA is captured, but but not by pharma.
So it actually did some science and it said 1989,
it's a red line, that's the year.
Now could be, let me get into that a minute.
And then the last category is allergic diseases.
Is food allergies, peanut allergies, anaphylaxis.
I never heard of eczema.
Now you go into every classroom and, anaphylaxis.
By the way, my kids, so many
of my kids had food allergies..
And I helped found the food allergy initiative.
We raised and my, a guy I was suing constantly,
David Koch, was my partner starting this thing.
So he had a kid the same age as mine
with, who was anaphylaxis.
We brought $200 million, we brought all these doctors up
and scientists, we created a lab.
What I found out is these scientists,
the way they study food allergies,
is they give rats allergies,
they induce them, allergies in the rat.
And then they study it.
How do you induce allergy in a rat?
You give 'em the aluminum adjuvant
from the hepatitis B vaccine, along with the protein.
So if you give 'em a peanut protein,
he now his peanut allergies.
If you give him a latex protein,
he now his latex allergies.
If you give him a dairy protein, he now his dairy allergies.
That's how they give it to him.
Well, and not only is, the protein doesn't have
to be in the syringe.
And a lot of our vaccines have peanut oil excipients.
So it's not, it's no mystery
where the peanut allergies are coming from.
But also, if there's something
in the ambient, in the environment at the time,
like if there's a Timothy weed outbreak,
that kid now is gonna have a lifetime allergy
to Timothy weed.
That's why vaccinated children,
this is at two studies by Cowling and Lawson,
and have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis
as unvaccinated children.
They're sick all the time.
Am I out of time or something?
Participant: Turn this back on, I'm sorry.
-: You could have just told me.
(audience laughing)
Oh, anyway, thank you.
So anyway, you know what, let me talk
about something else for just a couple minutes.
A subject I know I wasn't gonna talk about,
but somebody brought this up at dinner.
I was gonna talk about COVID and what happened there.
And the reaction to COVID was this weird reaction
where it was not a public health reaction,
it was a militarized and monetized reaction.
And it happened all over the world at once.
All these liberal democracies suddenly pivoted
and imposed these totalitarian controls,
which were irrational, that were not scientifically valid,
that had been discredited, et cetera, lockdowns.
And they went after, of course, to keep us
from complaining or talking about 'em
or questioning them.
They imposed censorship from day one.
And the founders specifically,
Hamilton, Madison, Adams said
we put freedom of expression in the First Amendment
because all the other amendments are dependent on it.
Because if you give a government the right
to silence their opponents,
they now have a license for any atrocity.
And they'll start getting rid of all the amendments.
(audience applauding)
So what do they do?
As soon as they could censor us,
they went after the other part of the First Amendment,
which is freedom of worship.
They closed all the churches in the country for a year,
without any scientific citation, with no regulatory process.
No, there's no, I've been suing it government
for 40 years for not doing public hearings,
for not doing an environmental impact statement
when they're gonna pass a regulation.
They gotta do an environmental impact statement
and show the cost and benefits,
who's gonna get hurt if they list
all the scientific studies?
Hey, and by the way, you can do it in an emergency
and still be doing the environmental impact,
still do the democracy while you're locking people down,
if it's an emergency.
But you can't stop the democracy.
Then there's notice and comment rulemaking.
So everybody gets to read it.
They have to publish their proposed rule.
They have to give people 60, or 30 or 90 days
to comment on it.
They have to respond to all those comments.
So if somebody, if you're passing a mask mandate
and I own a kayak company and I say if I make
my clients wear masks, they're gonna drown.
You have to respond, the government has to respond.
And they usually do it by saying,
"Well we're gonna give you an exemption
"'cause you're out to, you're in the sun,
"we want you there getting healthy."
But there was nothing like that.
It was just everybody do it.
And there was no notice, comment, rule-making.
And then they go after the part three
of the First Amendment, which is freedom of assembly,
by making us all social distance.
And then they go after the Fifth Amendment, property rights.
They closed 3.3 million businesses with no due process,
no just compensation.
Just one guy who's been in there for 50 years saying,
masks don't work one week,
and two weeks later everybody put one on.
It's just completely the definition
of arbitrary and capricious.
Not a single scientific citation ever, for two years.
And then they went after jury trials.
Here's what the Seventh Amendment says,
"No Americans shall be denied the right of their, of a,
"a trial before a jury of their peers in cases where
"their controversy is exceeding $25 in value."
That's it.
There's no pandemic exception.
There's, and by the way, the founders knew
all about pandemics.
There were two epidemics during the Revolutionary War.
There was a epidemic that decimated the armies
of Virginia with malaria.
And then there was a smallpox epidemic
that totally debilitated Benedict Arnold's army
when he took Montreal.
If it weren't for that epidemic, we would,
Canada would be part of the United States today,
'cause we took Montreal.
But because they didn't have the manpower,
'cause of the epidemic, they had to withdraw.
And between the end of the revolution
and the writing of the Constitution,
there were at least two or three
really serious epidemics every year.
Smallpox, yellow fever, in all of our cities,
cholera that killed tens of thousands of people.
So the founders knew all about epidemics,
but they didn't put an exemption in the Constitution.
So I, and then they, of course,
they went after the Fourth Amendment,
prohibition against warrantless searches and seizures.
And we all have to give our medical information
before we go into a bowling alley or a public building.
(audience laughing)
Really like, they got rid of every one
of the first 10 amendments except for the Second Amendment.
It's the only one that was left intact.
And so I looked at this and I said,
how did this happen?
Because it's not just happening here,
it's happening all over the world.
And that, and the information in the last chapter
in my book was, to me, the most shocking revelation.
Because what I found was I saw this Event 201,
and raise your hand if you know what Event 201 was.
Okay, for those of you who don't know,
Event 201 was a pandemic simulation,
a coronavirus pandemic simulation
that took place in October of 2019.
Nobody had ever heard of coronavirus till January.
So that's four, three months later, in October.
We now know that coronavirus was already circulating
in September, so the month before, in Wuhan,
but nobody knew about it.
And yet they had a coronavirus pandemic simulation
in New York City hosted by Bill Gates
and Avril Haines, the deputy, former deputy director
of the CIA who did all of the Guantanamo Bay coverup.
She is like the coverup queen.
And they do a simulation and who else is there?
George Gao, the head of Chinese CDC,
who obviously knows the coronavirus is circulating.
He is the world's coronavirus expert.
He's also the head of the CDC in China.
And then they had all of the social media platforms
were there, the big insurance companies,
Johnson and Johnson, the big pharma companies.
And they meet for two days.
And they have four seminars
and each one is faking this, coronavirus is spreading
across the world.
And they simulate, they don't say, okay,
we got vitamin D to everybody
and we gotta make sure everybody gets exercise
and gets outta their house and gets healthy
and builds their immune system.
And there's none of that, and zinc and all the things.
We gotta figure out early treatments,
we gotta use the internet to connect
all 15 million doctors, frontline doctors around the world,
so that we know when they treat people,
what's working, what's not.
And we're constantly upgrading the protocols.
That's what they should have been doing.
That's not what they're doing.
They were working on ways to use the coronavirus pandemic
as a pretense
for clamping down totalitarian controls globally.
And they talk about in some of these concentration camps
and all of this stuff,
but here the last simulation on the fourth day,
George Gao and Avril Haines from the CIA, are talking.
They have a soliloquy about how do we clamp down,
stop people from saying this came from a lab leak?
They're saying that.
This is in October of 2019.
And they say, well, we gotta get the social media companies
to censor them and deplatform them and all this.
You can go on YouTube and watch this tonight.
It's called Event 201,
and this is the fourth section of it.
Oh, and people knew about that,
who were looking at this like me.
And from almost the beginning,
but then I started doing a deep dive
when I was writing the book.
And I found out that was not a on-off.
And I describe, in that book, I found about 20
of these that they had been doing since 2001.
And they're all scripted by the CIA.
And all of them include top-level officials like,
James Woolsey, the deputy director of the CIA, Tara O'Toole,
all of them have senior CIA official,
many of them have famous people,
who kind of given the, imprimatur of legitimacy
to what they're doing.
Like Madeleine Albright, or Tom Daschle, or you know,
Bill Gates did a lot of 'em, and Gro Brundtland
from the WHO.
People who are respected and all,
and they end up drilling, each one of 'em,
is drilling the imposition of totalitarian controls.
They're collectively, they have names like Dark Winter,
and Crimson Contagion, and all these weird names,
but collectively they're called Operation Lockstep.
And they involved hundreds of thousands of people,
public officials from little towns all over America,
health officials from the state, police, firefighters,
hospital systems, public utilities,
and FBI, CIA, U.S. Marshals, in Canada,
the United States, all over Europe, Australia and China.
They were all doing it together, drilling.
Here's what we're gonna do when a pandemic comes.
And a lot of these people you can see are surprised
about what they're doing.
But they're probably looking around and saying,
"Well, everybody else thinks this is okay.
"so I guess this is what we do when the pandemic comes."
So they got, they drilled people in doing something
that was clearly contrary to their values.
But it got them all teed up to do it
and do it all at once and say,
"This is what you do when there's a pandemic.
"The first thing you do is you end freedom
"of speech and you start gutting the Constitution."
So, I look back, in my new book, I talk about the history
of the U.S. Bioweapons program.
And from the beginning,
the CIA was running the bioweapons program.
Why?
Because we didn't have a bioweapons program
after World War II.
And the CIA's first operation was called,
Operation Paperclip.
And it was an operation to get all the bioweapons
and nuclear and chemical scientists
out of Germany and Japan,
where they had extensive bioweapons program.
The Japanese had a horrendous program where they were doing,
they did live vivisections on 3000 people.
They killed them all during the operation,
removing their infected organs
while they were alive with no anesthesia.
And these were horrible, horrible scientists.
The CIA elevated them, brought them over
to Fort Detrick, downloaded them
and made them the heads of hospital systems
and pharmaceutical companies in Japan,
and continued to work with them.
And they brought all the German scientists over here,
and then they did all these experiments, unwittingly,
on the American public.
They sprayed toxins in National Airport.
They sprayed 'em in the Pentagon air conditioning system.
They put poison water in NIH.
They put light bulbs filled with bacteria
that they broke on the grates
and contaminated the New York City subway system.
Some of those microbes still in the subway today.
They, they did aerial dosing and from ships
of about 60 million Americans.
They dosed San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York,
Virginia, Norfolk, Virginia.
All of the seaside towns were dosed from the air.
And a lot of the Midwestern cities were also dosed.
They're all unwitting.
They did 200 outdoor tests on Americans, unwitting.
And they developed bioweapons by 1969,
had a nuclear equivalent.
They could kill people at 29 cents per death,
according to his CIA study, which they're bragging about.
And then in '69, president Nixon shocks the world
by going to Fort Detrick
and ending the U.S. Bioweapons program.
He was worried that we were creating bioweapons
that could be reproduced for nothing.
They were kind of a poor man's nuclear bomb.
Anybody could reproduce 'em once we,
and we were publishing how you did it.
So they were giving blueprints to foreign nations
to create these things that could be used against us.
And he said, why are we doing this?
We have nuclear bombs.
We don't need these things.
And we have a monopoly on nuclear bombs,
seven nations to have 'em.
We've agreed not to give 'em to anybody else.
Why are we letting these guys get weapons
that are gonna be turned against us?
So he shut down the whole program.
The Pentagon destroyed all of its bioweapons.
But the CIA went into Fort Detrick,
right before the Pentagon went in there,
and took cultures of all the different weapons
and hid them in a warehouse.
A lot of it was hidden in New York City and Washington D.C.
and they continued.
We signed the Bioweapons Treaty,
which Nixon, one of the great accomplishments of Nixon,
he got all the nations of the world to sign it.
We signed the Geneva Convention, finally,
after delaying it for 50 years.
The CIA was breaking the law the entire time.
Then in 2001, in June,
the CIA sponsors the first
of its pandemic simulations.
It simulates a biological attack on Washington D.C.
by Saddam Hussein.
This is in June 2001.
That simulation got international press,
And a lot of the CIA people, like Judith Miller,
from the New York Times was promoting it,
going around doing all the talk shows.
It triggered two Senate hearings,
one by Joe Biden's committee.
And that hearing was in September, 2001.
What happened in September 2001?
The 9/11.
So that hearing was going on during 9/11.
As soon as 9/11 happened, the neocons,
which were working on all this stuff with the CIA,
pulled out the Patriot Act, a 350-page statute
from a shelf where he had been waiting for a while,
and in one week said, we wanna pass this in a week.
There's only one member of Congress who read it,
which was Dennis Kucinich.
And he went crazy
and said "You have no idea, this is the end
"of American democracy if you do this."
It allows the CIA to spy on Americans.
One of the things the Patriot Act did is,
it did not get rid of the Geneva Convention
or the Bioweapons Treaty,
but it said no federal official can be prosecuted
for violating those two statutes.
So it reopened the bioweapons arms race globally.
And when the, a week after,
when the Patriot Act was being debated
and it was being held up by two senators,
there was an anthrax attack on the U.S. Capitol.
It was blamed on Saddam Hussein.
And they, the neocons all said, "See we were right,
"in the pandemic simulation, Saddam Hussein attacked us."
And we used that as a justification to go to war
against Saddam Hussein.
And within two days we passed the Patriot Act.
Who got the Anthrax?
Two senate offices, Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy,
the two senators who were blocking the Patriot Act.
The FBI did a one-year investigation.
They said this anthrax was unique,
it was Ames Anthrax and there's only one place
in the world it would come from, Fort Detrick,
the CIA lab.
So we went to war, we passed the Patriot Act
and immediately started giving $2 billion a year
to bioweapons development.
The Pentagon didn't want to do it
because it was nervous about the legality,
'cause it was a death penalty
to violate the Geneva Convention.
Oh, you would've been committing a war crime,
even if somebody told you it was okay, it wasn't.
And so they funneled it through DETRA and DARPA.
They funneled all of that money to NIH to NIAID,
which became the primary spear tip
of bioweapons development.
So Tony Fauci became the bioweapon czar in 2001.
His budget went up by $2.2 billion.
He was personally given a 68% raise from the military.
That's why he was the highest paid individual
in the federal government,
because he was getting this 68% bonus every year
from the military.
But it meant that he could not stop.
And the thing the military wanted was,
gain-of-function studies, where they could take wild viruses
and turn them into bioweapons.
And bioweapons development
always includes vaccine development,
because unlike chemical weapons, with bioweapons,
there's always blowback.
It's called the boomerang effect.
If you give your enemy bubonic plague,
your guys are gonna get it first.
Two, they're gonna get it quickly.
So the only way you can deploy bioweapons is
if you have already developed a vaccine.
So the race is to develop a vaccine simultaneously,
with the bioweapons,
and then you can deploy the bioweapons
and your enemy will take a couple of years
to develop the vaccine.
And you can inoculate all of your team.
So in 2014, three of Tony Fauci's bugs escaped
from federal labs.
And their escapes were public
and it caused a huge brouhaha.
There were Senate hearings and people were immensely upset.
And 300 scientists wrote a petition
to President Obama saying, you have to shut down Tony Fauci,
he's gonna cause a global pandemic.
And Obama declared a moratorium
and told Fauci, ordered Fauci to shut down the 18 studies
he was then doing,
As I show in my book, he didn't do it.
He instead took that science
and he moved it offshore to the Wuhan lab
and to the Ukraine.
And when he did that, he was not the only one who did it.
Tony Fauci spent about $29 million
on gain-of-function science in Wuhan.
But the CIA spent over a $100 million
and the military spent about that much too,
about $64 million.
And they, the CIA funneled the money,
most of it through USAID.
But they also, the CIA, as we now know,
was also running this organization,
called the EcoHealth Alliance,
which Fauci was funneling his money through.
It was like a laundromat where they funneled federal money
so that their fingerprints would not be visible
on those studies.
And so that's important to understand.
Now, just to get to the final thing
in my book and Tony Fauci,
if any of you end up reading the book,
that last chapter, is, talks about all of these,
these pandemic simulations.
I've been studying the CIA for much of my adult life
because of my family's relationship.
I wrote a book, which to me is
my best book, "American Values."
And it is the story of my family's 60-year fistfight
with the CIA, which began with my grandfather,
Joseph Kennedy, who served on the Hoover Commission
in 1955 and recommended the disbanding
of the CIA's Plans Division.
It's the division that was fixing elections
and assassinating leaders and all of that.
So the CIA never forgave my family for that.
And then when my uncle came in after the Bay of Pigs,
he fired the top three officials,
Bissell and Cabell, and Allen Dulles,
who then made himself the head of the Warren Commission,
three years later.
And when my uncle died, he told a reporter,
I'm glad the little shit is dead.
He thought he was a god.
And so I know a lot about the CIA.
I've gotten their manuals,
I paid over a thousand dollars to get these manuals,
their training manuals from MK-Ultra.
and MK stands for mind control, MKNaomi and MKDetrick.
It all came out of Fort Detrick and NIH,
and then 150 colleges around our country
where they were funding these studies.
And if you look at what they do in these simulations,
they're using all of these techniques
that they developed in colleges, in college laboratories,
social scientists and other scientists,
medical scientists, for years who were studying
how do you control individual behavior,
but also mass behavior?
How do you induce mass psychosis?
How do you create Manchurian candidates?
How do you do all these?
They had all these colleges studying these.
And how do you impose centralized foreign control
on indigenous populations?
By coming into a country, by using propaganda,
by using fear, by sowing chaos, by destroying relationships,
destroying faith in institutions,
driving people apart and creating chaos,
so they will invite in an authority
who will give them peace and safety.
And all of these mind control techniques are designed
to accelerate that process.
And they study the Stockholm Syndrome, for example.
How do you, if you lock people down,
they become grateful to their captors
and they become angry at the people
who criticize their captors.
And they believe that the only way
that they can escape this confinement is
through total obedience and total compliance
to their jailers.
But one of the most interesting experiments was called...
Anyway, I'll think of it.
(audience laughing)
Stan, it was what?
Milgram, Milgram.
And there there was a scientist,
associate scientist at Yale,
a sociologist called Stanley Milgram,
who was part of the MK-Ultra program.
And he conducted this experiment
where he recruited subjects from every walk
of American life.
There were students, there were professors,
there were business people, there were Blacks, Whites,
everybody from the New Haven area.
And he would put these subjects in a chair
at a table where there was a dial in front of them
that they could administer an electric shock
to a person who was tied in the chair
in the next room, who they told was tied in a chair.
But he was actually a confederate of Milgram's.
He was an actor.
And when they turned this dial up
and administered the supposed electric shock,
they could hear the man in the other room screaming,
shouting, begging, struggling, pleading with them, crying.
But most of the people who were participating
in this experiment begged to stop.
They, a lot of 'em were crying and telling the doctor,
the doctor was standing behind them saying,
turn it up, turn it down, turn it higher, turn it down,
turn it even higher, turn it down.
And 67% of them turned it up to 250 volts,
where it was marked potentially fatal.
67%, and you can go on Wikipedia and look this up,
the Milgram Experiment.
But 33% of the people got up and walked out.
And what Milgram said that if you,
for 67% of the people, if you have an authority figure,
that has some imprimatur of legitimacy,
like a doctor's title, that 67% of people will take
his orders, even if it means violating
their most sacred values.
They'll go against everything they believe in.
And to me, it occurred to me many times during that 2020,
that we were all involved in this huge Milgram experiment,
and that Anthony Fauci was Dr. Milgram,
telling us you can violate the constitution,
you can censor speech, you can close churches,
you can shut businesses, you can ban jury trials,
and you can tell people what they can and can't do.
And you can gaslight them and marginalize them
and vilify them.
And no cruelty is too great for somebody who disobeys.
And what I would say to you is
that 33% of the people walked out
and the people in this room are the 33%
who wouldn't be told what to do.
(audience applauding)
And what our job is now is
to fight for the 67%, till they wake up,
and till they're able to fight for themselves
to restore the freedoms that all of us believe in.
And I'll leave you with three thoughts.
One is that any power that government takes
from the people, it will never return voluntarily.
Number two rule, every power that government takes,
it will ultimately abuse to the ultimate
to the maximum extent possible.
And number three, nobody ever complied
their way out of totalitarianism.
The only thing we can do is resist.
Thank you all very much.
(audience applauding)